Medical Negligence in Port--Holland America May be Responsible

Michael Myers
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 580
Posted by Michael MyersNovember 01, 2008 6:49 PM

We recently communicated with a family who suffered a tragedy. Their mother slipped and fell on a Holland America vessel. Treatement was provided at a hospital located at the next port city. Unfortunately the mother died. Concern existed regarding the division of responsibility between Holland America and the hospital.

The inquiry touched on pretty common issue in personal injury litigation: what happens when a person is injured and is made worse by her providers.

There is a body of law that provides that medical malpractice is a foreseeable consequence of injuring someone. As a result, the party that caused the initial injury is liable for not just the initial injury, but any additional harm that’s caused in the course of treating that injury.

In most cases it doesn't make sense to pursue a medical malpractice action in a foreign country. Fortunately, however, there’s a good argument that Holland America should be held responsible for the the additional harm caused at the hospital when its negligence was the casue of the initial injury.

Note: Our firm has handled approximately 50 cases against Holland America. All cases against Holland America must be litigated in Seattle pursuant to the terms of the ticket purchased by passengers. The ticket provides that written claims must be submitted to Holland America within six months of the incident and suit must be filed within one year.

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Charles A. Pilcher MD FACEP
Posted by Charles A. Pilcher MD FACEP
November 03, 2008 7:00 PM

I've always been puzzled by the logic of the body of law that says that "medical malpractice is a FORESEEABLE consequence of injuring someone" and making the index party liable for that. I cited an example in my June newsletter (More ... )on a case from Honolulu. How broadly does this concept apply? E.g., would a convicted assailant be liable for the malpractice of the physician treating his victim? Or even the malpractice of a specialty attorney to whom a general attorney referred a client?

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Tacoma

InjuryBoard Tacoma RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Tacoma is brought to you by Myers & Company, P.L.L.C

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Myers & Company, P.L.L.C (866) 735-1102 Ext 580 www.myers-company.com/
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Seattle, Tacoma, Bainbridge Island, Lynwood, Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace, Shorewood, Burien, Shoreline, SeaTac Des Moines, Kent, Auburn, Federal Way, Puyallup, Parkland, Lakewood, University Place
1809 Seventh AvenueSuite 700, Seattle, Washington 98101 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address